The Best Fluffy Pancakes recipe you will fall in love with. Full of tips and tricks to help you make the best pancakes.
CHEAPUNO guide
How to verify AI code before trusting it
Stop blindly accepting AI generated code by adopting a manual review and testing protocol that catches logical errors.
What you are probably seeing
You see production errors that do not match the AI generated test results, indicating the logic is flawed despite passing automated checks.
You spend more time debugging AI output than writing code from scratch because you cannot trace the specific cause of failure in the generated structure.
Why it happens
AI models predict the next most likely token based on patterns, not actual execution logic, so they can create code that looks correct but fails in specific edge cases.
Relying on automated tests alone is insufficient because AI often generates tests that mirror its own flawed assumptions, creating a feedback loop where errors remain undetected.
What changed recently
Step by step
1. Manually trace the execution path of critical functions by hand before running them to spot logical gaps.
2. Write specific negative test cases that attempt to break the code using invalid inputs or edge scenarios.
3. Isolate AI generated snippets into small, reviewable chunks rather than accepting large blocks of code at once.
4. Log every assumption the AI made about your system architecture and verify each one against your actual codebase.
5. Perform a peer review where a human who was not involved in the generation process audits the final implementation.
Ways to go further
Affiliate links: CHEAPUNO may earn a commission if you buy through them, at no extra cost to you.
Other problems readers raise
How to compare code review tools for maintenance and design?
How to test AI code reviews for GitHub traceability gaps?
Is technical writing as valuable as coding or AI?
Is technical writing a standalone career or just an engineering bonus?
Should I use a Claude Code skill file or CLAUDE.md for reviews?